Bibliography: Nomos and Physis

Berns, G. 1973. “Nomos and Physis (An Interpretation of Euripides’ Hippolytos).” Hermes 101: 165-187.

Cohen, G. A. 2013. Lectures on the History of Moral and Political Philosophy. J. Wolff ed. Princeton.

See especially chapter one, “Plato and His Predecessors,” pp. 3–64.

Gigante, M. 1956. Nomos Basileus. Naples.

Grote, D. 1994. “Callicles’ Use of Pindar’s Νόμοϛ βασιλεύϛ: Gorgias 484B.” CJ 90: 21–31.

Heinimann, F. 1945. Nomos und Physis. Basel.

Hirzel, R. 1900. “Ἄγραφος Νόμος,” in Abh. d. philol-hist. Cl. d. Kgl. Sächs. Ges. d. Wiss. 20.1: Leipzig. [full citation needed]

Immerwahr, H. R. 1966. Form and Thought in Herodotus. Atlanta.

Johann, H.-Th. 1973. “Hippias von Elis und der Physis-Nomos-Gedanke.” Phronesis 18.1: 15-25.

Kerferd, G. B. 1981. The Sophistic Movement. Cambridge.

Kyriakou, P. 2002. “The Violence of Nomos in Pindar fr. 169a.” MD 48: 195–206.

Lloyd-Jones, H. 1972. “Pindar Fr. 169.” HSCPh 76: 45-56.

Moulton, C. 1972. “Antiphon the Sophist, on Truth.” TAPhA 103: 329-366.

Ostwald, M. 1965. “Pindar, Nomos, and Heracles: (Pindar, frg. 169 [Snell2]+POxy. No. 2450, frg. I): Dedicated to Harry Caplan.” HSPh 69: 109–138.

—— 1969. Nomos and the Beginnings of the Athenian Democracy. Oxford.

Pohlenz, M. 1953. “Nomos und Physis.” Hermes 81.4: 418–438.

Rutherford, R. B. 1995. The Art of Plato: Ten Essays in Platonic Interpretation. Cambridge, MA.

Stier, H. E. 1928. “Νόμος Βασιλεύς.” Philologus 83: 225–258. [abbreviation needed]

Taylor, C.C.W. 2007. “Nomos and Phusis in Democritus and Plato.” Social Philosophy and Policy 24: 1–20.

Thomas, R. 2002. Herodotus in Context: Ethnography, Science and the Art of Persuasion. Cambridge.

—— 2006. “Intellectual Milieu of Herodotus,” in Dewald & Marincola edd. 2006: 60–75.

Dewald, C. & J. Marincola 2006. The Cambridge Companion to Herodotus. Cambridge.

Weimer, C. 2011. “Building Barbarian Belief: Religion, Nomos, and Tolerance in Herodotus’ Histories.” Master’s thesis. San Francisco State University.

Leave a Reply